Wednesday, 9 October 2013

OUGD504 - What Is Design For Print? (Studio Session 3)

For this session we were split into groups and had to discuss the breakdowns of the five logos/branding we brought in.
My 5:
Fairtrade
  • For fairtrade products
  • Green & blue - earth colours, grass & water. Ethical & organic.
  • Similar to Ying & Yang sign
  • Person waving - friendly
  • Simple image - will be easy to recognise and see at different sizes & on different stocks
  • Type is sans serif & bold - easy to read.
  • Memorable image that will be recognisable without text
Common Man
  • Identity for restaurant based in Melbourne
  • Simple design - can be used on any kind of stock, easily printed & easily read
  • Black - easily seen on any colour
  • Sans serif typeface - approachable, common
Mexout
  • Mexican restaurant in Singapore
  • Hand drawn logo - implies a casual/young atmosphere
  • Black on white - sophistication
Mind
  • Identity for mental health charity
  • Attempted visual representation of what someone's mind would be like living with a mental health issues
  • Hand written style of type - approachable, contemporary and appeals to a wide audience
  • Blue - calming colour
Woodblock Chocolate
  • Chocolate brand based in America
  • Simple typeface - different from usual chocolate brands
  • Blue on white - stands out from other colours used for chocolate brands
Task: Take a logo/s that particularly interested you and do a full breakdown with research into why the logo/s have been created that way. Give initial thoughts, research & comparisons between the two.

Mind
Original identities
Rebranded identity
Mind is a charity to aid those with mental health issues. It was founded in 1946, originally as the National Association for Mental Health, and renamed as 'Mind' in 1972. The newest branding was designed by brand consultancy Glazer.
Initial research into Mind's branding shows that the local branches were adapting the existing logo to suit their own purposes, which in turn diluted the brand and the strong brand message of a united cause, ambition and cause against mental health. With areas of the business not using the same branding, it makes the business seem disjointed and not as one, which is a big problem when it comes to serious issues like mental health, where dependability and professionalism is key.
Glazer worked with the leadership team of Mind to identify the charities ambition, purpose, values and behaviours, and used that to create a new brand identity which reflected these.
In the original branding a dove is used, which is a symbol of many things, from love to hope and promise. Although this does work with the charity's aims, it is a widely used symbol and doesn't individualise the charity. If you saw the dove, you wouldn't instantly think of Mind, like seeing the M for McDonalds. To solve this problem a new logo was created which The new is a visual metaphor for essentially what a mind of a mental health patient would be, and gives the impression that working with the charity will solve the problems and confusions, that it will clear their mind.
The main difference between the two brand designs is that the new one is a lot more contemporary and approachable, whereas the original is very serious and could be off-putting to people who are reluctant to get help for their issues. In this sense the branding is successful and the message is quite clear in something which is hard to create a visual representation for. The logo fulfils its purpose.

 Rover
On first look it is unclear as to why a viking longboat is used as the logo for a car company identity. Initially thoughts are that they hold themselves in high stead and feel they are a superior brand. The use of gold, red and black also gives this impression as they are bold colours which when together seem majestic and important.
When researching into this, it becomes clear very quickly as to why the longboat is used. 'Rover' as a word, not a name, means a wanderer. Knowing this, it makes it very obvious what the logo is representing. The company are saying that they are wanderers or explorers in their field, implying that they have a certain greatness over other 'boring' car companies.
If someone does not have this knowledge then the logo really doesn't give across the message it's trying to. When the knowledge is known it is successful and the concept is good, but it is unsuccessful branding because memorable logos with a good concept need to be seen immediately.

Starbucks
On first look, it is clear that the image is of a mermaid, however the relevance to a coffee shop is a little puzzling. The original logo was is brown, like coffee, however because this is a generic colour for coffee, it has been changed to green. This is unclear at first but further research into this shows that coffee beans are green before they are roasted and turned brown. Losing the text around the image is also something they have done, and this is successful because the logo is so widely recognised all over the world. When you see it, you know it is Starbucks, so in that sense the logo is successful because it is memorable. They haven't changed the logo a huge amount since 1987, rather just modified it, keeping the same image and zooming in on it, keeping it clear exactly what the image is of.
Research into the reason for use of a mermaid becomes very clear quickly. In order to capture the history of coffee involving seaports and sea travel, the designers looked into old marine books, including Moby Dick, where there is a shipmate called Starbuck. The image is not of a mermaid, but of a two tailed siren, which features all throughout Greek Mythology. It is a sea creature which is dangerous and beautiful creatures who lured sailors with their voices and songs to shipwreck on the rocky coast of their island. In relevance to a brand, using the image is them pretty much saying that their coffee is irresistible and draws you in.
Knowing this, it becomes clear the message that the brand is trying to put across, and exactly what they think of their brand and products. They hold themselves as a superior coffee maker to others, and using the image of a siren puts across that they think their coffee is more addictive and better quality than others. As a whole, I do think that the branding is successful, because even if you don't know the exact history behind the image, you do know it is a sea creature and you do recognise it easily, even without the brand name, which is something that is quite hard to achieve.

Virgin
Virgin Group is a multinational brand created by Richard Branson in 1970, and operates in multiple areas of business, most recognised for travel, entertainment and lifestyle. Overall there are 400 different businesses worldwide underneath the Virgin name. The logo was designed by Trevor Kay and Ray Kyte. Branson has described the 'V' as an expressive tick, representing the Virgin seal of approval. This V on it's own is widely recognised.
Initials thoughts when looking at the logo is that the hand written style type is a lot more approachable than a straight-laced typeface used by other corporate companies. It also almost humanises the brand as a whole and makes it seem a lot more relaxed, fun and open, which is also reflected in the colour choice of red. This colour indicates a sense of boldness and playfulness and implies that there is a sense of exploration and ambition to the company. Red represents many things including action, exciting, powerful, passionate and determination, which I think are all things that a brand does want to put across to assert itself as superior and above other brands in a similar field.
There isn't necessarily a huge amount of a concept put into the making of this brand other than wanting to put across what red & hand written work defines, so I think that the branding is successful. It is a logo where just looking at it, the meaning behind each decision is clear and not too hard to understand the reason behind it.

Tuesday, 8 October 2013

OUGD504 - What Is Design For Print? (Studio Session 2)

Studio Session - 8/10/13
Studio brief:

As a group we had to discuss what we had found when looking for examples of the six categories and come up with definitions and an understanding of each.
Group summation
As a class we shared these and wrote a general list from what we had all decided upon:
What is...
Format - Scale, size - working with that
Colour - colour modes, hue, functions etc
Production - 'The actual working of it' - collection of processes to create final product
Process - The method
Finishing - Production & process
Stock - Substrates of printing/considerations

All of these are linked.

Using the five physical printed sheets/objects, in groups we had to put them into the following categories: Format, Colour, Production, Process, Cost & Subject areas.

Format
We split the formats down into: Bags, Packaging, Business cards, Vinyl cases, Magazines/Catalogues, Books & Leaflets.
We decided to split the objects into these groups because of the large variety of shapes and sizes, so putting them into categories for purpose made it simpler. We found this helped us see the different quality and variety of objects in these sub-categories. We found we had quite a large variety of each of these categories.
 
Colour
In this category we split the objects down into four sections: Full colour, 1 colour/mono print & 2 & 3 colour & monochrome.
Looking over the variety of objects, the majority were either full colour of mono print. We discussed whether we would count stock as a colour as well, deciding that we wouldn't count stock and would only count ink colours. We found the majority of objects were one colour on stock, and the category with the least objects was monochrome.
Production
We split production into three groups: Mass Production, Short-run production & Bespoke production.
We discussed what we all perceived each of these titles to be. The main issue that came up was that these objects are all created specifically for their purpose, meaning they were bespoke, but they are made in large volumes, meaning they are also mass produced. After discussion it was decided that the same could be said for any object, and that because of the large quantity of the same object, they would be classed as mass produced.
We also found that many of the items mass produced were made of a cheaper quality, and those in the short run/bespoke were of a higher quality, with more expensive stock or printing processes.
 Process
We split the objects down into five categories: Digital print, Screen printing, Letter Press, Finishing/Foiling. We found that the majority of objects were digitally printed. The more high end objects were foiled or finished very well, and the lower end objects were printed cheaply.
 Cost
We had to put the objects in order for cost per unit. To start this one off we referred back to the choices we had made in the previous categories, deciding on the cost of each print process, an average on how much it would have cost to assemble, the amount of pages/sheets used for each object and the quality of the stock. Getting an initial idea was easy, with the cheap stock having the worst quality, so therefore the cheapest price, and vice versa for the more expensive objects. The issue came in deciding on the price per unit for printing the editorial objects, such as newspapers and magazines. We decided quickly that newspapers were made on such a large scale that the cost would be relatively cheap, but not so cheap because of the cost of the inks.
 Subjects/Areas
We split the objects down into four areas: Branding/Identity, Editorial/Publishing, Packaging/Promotion & Information/Way finding. We found the majority of objects were in packaging/promotion and the least were in branding/identity.

From the exercises we then had to write a list of everything we don't know, that we would like to find out about printing.
My list:
  • Difference between bag packaging and branding
  • What counts as mass production? How many units?
  • Definitions of mass production, short-run & bespoke
  • What counts as bespoke? Individual items or more than one?
Preparatory task
Collect 5 examples of logos/branding which will then be broken down and discussed in the next session.

Research & answers to questions I want answering about print
Difference between bag packaging and branding - is a branded shopping bag promotion or packaging?
Shopping bags can be classed as both promotion and packaging. They are a representation of the shop/brand as well as a carrier for the product bought. They are a constant reminder of where the the product was bought, meaning they are promotional material.

Definitions of Mass production, short run & bespoke
Mass Production: Method of producing goods in large quantities at low cost per unit with a sustained quality production. Goods/prints are standardised. Mass production requires mass consumption to work and keep unit costs low.
Short run: Short-run printing production is typically around 500 units or under and often uses digital printing techniques.
Bespoke: Bespoke is 'made to order' or made specifically for one purpose. A one-off design.

What counts as bespoke? Individual items or more than one?
Bespoke is an individual item/print created specifically for one customer.

Tuesday, 1 October 2013

OUGD504 - What is Design for Print? (Studio Session 1)

Studio session 1/10/13
In our summer brief groups we had to answer the question 'what is design for print' and try sum it up in one sentence. We began by making a list of everything that needed to be considered when designing for print.
  • Something physical
  • Mass production
  • Physical processes
  • Scale
  • Relevance of context - situation
  • CMYK
  • Production processes - process informs he design
  • Communication
  • Stock/material - Considerations of what you're printing onto
  • Technicalities - registration marks etc
From this we started to bring them together to write a summative statement.
External information/transferred onto a specific surface with the consideration of scale, purpose, process & situation.
 After a discussion as a group and a class it was a unanimous decision that designing for print could not be summed up into one single sentence.
  • Designing for print - the information is finite - can not be changed/retracted once printed.
  • Designing for web - information is dynamic - can be changed & updated.
Categories
  • Format
  • Colour
  • Production
  • Process
  • Finishing
  • Stock
Identifying Processes of printing
  • Screen printing
  • Spot varnishing
  • Foiling
  • Embossing
  • Etching
  • Laser printing/digital printing
  • 3D print
  • 4D printing
  • Collograph
  • Risograph
  • Metal type press/Letter press
  • Block printing
  • Lino cutting
  • Lithograph
  • Vinyl cutting
  • Mono printing
  • Laser cutting
What processes do I want to work on this year?
  • Digital printing, screen printing, laser cutting
For each of the categories find 2 examples
Format
BVD for IKEA - packaging
Link
Dave Sedgewick for BBC Philharmonic - leaflet

Processes
KOMBOH for Feist/Sled Island - Screen printing. Metallic silver on black
Link
Bravo Company for Junpiter Futbol - Printed & Embossed

Colour
Dave Sedgewick for BBC Philharmonic - Full colour printing
Neo Neo for Vietnamese New Year In Geneva - One colour printing

Production
Fanakalo for Porseleinberg - Mass Production
Link
Frederico Landini for Hoxton Window Project - One off design

Stock
Pentagram for Shake Shack - recyclable paper
Link
Ryan Atkinson for HypeForType - Newspaper

Finishing
Bia van Deventer for Manouche - Spot Varnish
Link
Graham Robson - Japanese Binding